Czasopismo | GOSPODARKA WODNA | Rocznik 2019 - zeszyt 2

Przegląd doświadczeń związanych z rozbiórką zapór wodnych na świecie oraz z usuwaniem i utylizacją osadów zgromadzonych w czaszach likwidowanych zbiorników zaporowych Artykuł dyskusyjny Część II

Review of experiences related to dismantling of dams in different parts of the world and concerning the removal and disposal of deposits accumulated in the basins of the liquidated reservoirs

nr katalogowy: 118613

Streszczenie

Artykuł powstał na bazie przeglądu światowej literatury naukowej dotyczącej starzenia się i zamulania zbiorników zaporowych i problemów z tym związanych. W artykule skoncentrowano się na metodach usuwania i utylizacji osadów dennych na podstawie licznych dotychczasowych doświadczeń, głównie z terenu USA. Przedstawiono również korzyści i zagrożenia dla ludzi i środowiska, które powstają w efekcie likwidowania zbiorników zaporowych.

Abstract

The article was written based on a review of the international scientific literature regarding the ageing and siltation of dam reservoirs and the resulting problems. The article focuses mainly on the methods of elimination and disposal of bottom deposits, referring to various hitherto experiences, mainly on the territory of the United States. It also presents the benefits and threats for people and the environment resulting from the dam reservoirs liquidation.

Bibliografia

[1] American Rivers. 2014. Projects. http://www.americanrivers. org/initiative/dams/projects/2013-dam -removals/.
[2] ASCE. 1997. Task Committee on Guidelines for retirement of dams and hydroelectric facilities. American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, Dc, 71-85 pp.
[3] Aspen Institute. 2002. Dam Removal: A new option for a new century. Aspen Istitute; Queenstown.
[4] Babiński Z. 2002. Wpływ zapór na procesy korytowe rzek aluwialnych. Wydawnictwo Akademii Bydgoskiej.
[5] Bennett S.J., J.A. Dunbar, F.E. Rhoton, P.M. Allen, J.M. Bigham, G.R. Davidson, D.G. Wren. 2013. Assesing sedimentation issues with aging floodcontrol reservoirs. In The Challenges of Dam removal and River Restoration. Rev. Eng. Geol., 21, 25-44.
[6] Bountry J.A., Y. Lai, T.J. Randle. 2013. Sediment impacts from the Savage Rapids Dam removal, Rogue River, Oregon. in De Graff J.V. and Evans J.E., eds., The Chalenges of Dam Removal and River Restoratipon: Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, v. XXI, p. 93-104.
[7] Burroughs B.A., D.B. Hayes, K.D. Klomp, J.F. Hansen, J. Mistak. 2009. Effects of Stronach dam removal on fluvial geomorphology in the Pine River, Michigan, United States. Geomorphology 110, 96-107.
[8] Cui Y., J.K. Wooster, C. Braudrick, B.K. Orr. 2014. Lessons learned from sediment transport model predictions and long term postremoval monitoring: Marmot Dam removal project on the Sandy River in Oregon. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943- 7900.0000894, 04014044.
[9] Dood H.R. 1999. The effects of low-head lamprey barrier dams on stream habitat and fish communities in tributaries of the Great Lakes. Master’s thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
[10] Downs P.W., Y. Cui, J.K. Wooster, S.R. Dusterhoff, D.B. Booth, W.E. Dietrich, L.S. Sklar. 2009. Managing reservoir sediment release in dam removal projects: an approach informed by physical and numerical modeling of non-cohesive sediment. International Journal of River Basin Management 7, 433-452.
[11] Draut A.E., A.C. Ritchie. 2015. Sedimentology of new fluvial deposits on the Elwha River, Washington, USA, formed during large-scale dam removal. River Research and Applications, 31, 42-61.
[12] East A.E., G.R. Pess, J.A. Bountry, C.S. Magirl, A.C. Ritchie, J.B. Logan, T.J. Randle, M.C. Mastin, J.J. Duda, M.C. Liermann, M.L. McHenry, T.J. Beechie, P.B. Shafroth. 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: river channel and floodplain geomorphic change. Geomorphology 246, 687-708.
[13] Evans J.E. 2015. Contaminated sediment and dam removals: Problem or opportunity? Earth and Space Sciences News. Eos, 96, doi:10.1029/2015EO036385.
[14] Evans J.E., A.C. Wilcox. 2014. Fine sediment infiltration dynamics in a gravel-bed river following a sediment pulse. River Res. Appl. 30, 372-384.
[15] Gelfenbaum G., A.W. Stevens, I.M. Miller, J.A. Warrick, A.S. Ogston, E. Eidam. 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: coastal geomorphic change. Geomorphology. 246, 649-668.
[16] Grant G.E., S.L. Lewis. 2015. In Engineering Geology for Society and Territory. Vol. 3, G. Lollino et al. Eds. (Springer, Switzerland, 2015). pp 31-35.
[17] Great Lakes Commission. 2015. Comissions Launch new online mapping tool focusing on dams and the invasive sea lamprey. http://glc.org/files/ main/news/GLFC-news-release-sea-lampreyvisualization- tool-20150501.pdf.
[18] Heinz Center 2002. Dam removal Research; Status and Prospects. Heinz Center for Science. Economics and the environment; Washington DC.
[19] Hart D.D., T.E. Johnson, K.L. Bushaw-Newton, R.J. Horowitz, A.T. Bednarek, D.F. Charles, D.A. Kreeger, D.J. Velinsky. 2002. Dam removal: Challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. Biosciences 52, 669-681.
[20] Hickey H. 2013. Tracking sediments’ fate in largest- ever dam removal. http://depts.washington. edu/coenv/freshwater/2013/03/tracking-sediments- fate-in-largest-ever-dam-removal/
[21] http://europe.newsweek.com/worlds-largest- dam-removal-completed-fish-already-returning- 269231?rm=eu
[22] Kibler K.M., D.D. Tullos, G.M. Kondolf. 2010. Learning from dam removal monitoring; challenges to selecting experimental design and establishing significance of autcomes. River Research and Applications, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1415.
[23] Kondolf G.M. 1997. Hungry water: Effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management 21, 533-551.
[24] Major A.R., J.P. Warner. 2008. Contaminant sampling to facilitate dam removal/habitat restoration in new England, USFWS Spec. Rep. 53 pp., US Fish and Wildlife Serv., Washington, D.C.
[25] Major J.J., J.E. O’Connor, C.J. Podolak, M.K. Keith, G.E. Grant, K.R. Spicer, S. Pittman, H.M. Bragg, J.R. Wallick, D.Q. Tanner, A. Rhode, P.R. Wilcock. 2012. Geomorphicresponse of the Sandy River, Oregon, to removal of Marmot Dam. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1792 (64 pp.).
[26] MacBroom J., Loehmann E. 2008. Sediment management during low dam removal. In Proceedings World Enwironmental and Water Resources Congress. Ahupua’a pp. 1-10.
[27] Magirl C.S., R.C. Hilldale, C.A. Curran, J.J. Duda, T.D. Straub, M. Domanski, J.R. Foreman. 2015. Largescale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load. Geomorphology 246, 669-686.
[28] Malarz R. 2005. Geomorfologiczne skutki działania zapór wodnych w okresach powodziowych w dolinie Soły. Folia Geographica 35/36, 53-64.
[29] Marks J.C. 2007. Gdy tamy runą. Świat Nauki (Scientific American). Nr 4(188), 70-75.
[30] McClain S., L. Craig. 2015. Dam removal in the Mid-Atlantic: Regional trends in removal and science. Mid-Atlantic Stream Restoration Conference. September 2015.
[31] Nico L. 2011. Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet. aspx?SpeciesID=549 RevisionDate: 1/11/2011.
[32] O’Connor J.E., J.J. Duda, G.E. Grant. 2015. 1000 dams down and counting. Science 348, 496-497.
[33] Pearson A.J., N.P. Snyder, M. Collins. 2011. Rates and processes of channel response to dam removal with a sand-filled impoundment. Water Resour. Res. 47, W08504. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1029/2010WR009733.
[34] Przedwojski B., M. Wierzbicki. 2007. Skutki działania progów stabilizujących w korycie Warty poniżej zbiornika Jeziersko. Nauka Przyroda Technologie. Tom 1, Zeszyt 2, 1-10
[35] Randle T.J. 2002. Dam removal and sediment management. In Dam removal research; Status and prospects. The Heinz Center. 81-104.
[36] Randle T.J., J.A. Bountry, A. Ritchie, K. Wille. 2015. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA; Erosion of reservoir sediment. Geomorphology 246, 709-728.
[37] Rathburn S.L., E.E. Wohl. 2002. Sedimentation hazards downstream from reservoirs. In: Dam removal research; status and prospects. W.L. Graf ed. The Heinz Center.
[38] Rogers P. 2013. California’s biggest dam removal project in history begins in Carmel valley. San Jose Mercury News, 21 June 2013.
[39] Sando S.K., J.H. Lambing. 2011. Estimated loads of suspended sediment and selected trace elements transported trough the Clark Fork basin, Montana, in selected periods befor and after the breach of Milltown Dam (water years 1985-2009). U.S. Geol. Surv. Sci. Invest. Rep., 2011-5030, 64 pp.
[40] Sawaske S.R., D.L. Freyberg. 2012. A comparison of past small dam removals in highly sediment-impacted system in the U.S. Geomorphology 151, 50-58.
[41] Seng P., G. White. 2004. Indiana Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan. 1 Oct. 2003. Indiana Department of Natural Resources. 27 May 2004. http://www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/files/inansmanagementplan. pdf.
[42] Shafroth P.B., J.M. Friedman, T. Auble, M.L. Scott, J.H. Braatne. 2002. Potential response of riparian vegetation to dam removal. BioScience 52, 703-712.
[43] Shuman J.R. 1995. Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternativesfor river restoration. Regul. River 11, 249-261.
[44] Stanley E.H., M.W. Doyle. 2003. Trading off: the ecological effects of dam removal. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 15-22.
[45] Stanley E.H., M.A. Luebke, M.W. Doyle, D.W. Marshall. 2002. Short-term changes in channel form and macroinvertebrate communities following the low-head dam removal. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 21, 172-187.
[46] Stroud P.L. 2012. Sediment Strategies: Choosing a Sediment Management Option for Dam Removal. HydroWorld.com.
[47] Task Committee on Guidelines for Retirement of Dams and Hydroelectric facilities (TCGRDHF). 1997. New York; American Society of Civil Engineers.
[48] Wendee N. 2012. Lessons of the Elwha River: Managing Health Hazards during Dam Rmoval. Environmental Health Perspectives. 120, 431-435. http:// ehp.niehs.nih.gov/120-a430/.
[49] Wilcox A.C., J.E. O’Connor, J.J. Major. 2014. Rapid reservoir erosion, hyperconcentrated flow, and downstream deposition triggered by breaching of 38 m tall Condit Dam, White Salmon River, Washington. Journal of Geophysical Research; Earth Surface, 119, 1376-1394.

Jeśli masz wykupiony/przyznany dostęp - zaloguj się. Skorzystaj z naszych propozycji zakupu!

Publikacja


e-Publikacja (format pdf) - nr 118613 "Przegląd doświadczeń zwią..." licencja: Osobista Produkt cyfrowy	10.00 zł

Zeszyt


GOSPODARKA WODNA - e-zeszyt (pdf) 2019-2 licencja: Osobista Produkt cyfrowy	32.00 zł

Prenumerata

GOSPODARKA WODNA - prenumerata cyfrowa
licencja: Osobista

Produkt cyfrowy
Nowość

384.00 zł

GOSPODARKA WODNA - papierowa prenumerata roczna + wysyłka
licencja: Osobista

Szczegóły pakietu

Nazwa
GOSPODARKA WODNA - papierowa prenumerata roczna	432.00 zł brutto 400.00 zł netto 32.00 zł VAT (stawka VAT 8%)
GOSPODARKA WODNA - pakowanie i wysyłka	42.00 zł brutto 34.15 zł netto 7.85 zł VAT (stawka VAT 23%)

474.00 zł

GOSPODARKA WODNA - PAKIET prenumerata PLUS
licencja: Osobista

Szczegóły pakietu

Nazwa
GOSPODARKA WODNA - PAKIET prenumerata PLUS (Prenumerata papierowa + dostęp do portalu sigma-not.pl + e-prenumerata)	582.00 zł brutto 538.89 zł netto 43.11 zł VAT (stawka VAT 8%)

582.00 zł

Zeszyt

2019-2

Twój Koszyk

Publikacja

Zeszyt

Prenumerata

Zeszyt

Czasopisma